![]() 03/24/2016 at 20:27 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
This happened in Baltimore. The lady was not seriously injured.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 03/24/2016 at 20:35 |
|
Four rings. Four stories. Coincidence?
![]() 03/24/2016 at 20:39 |
|
Illuminaudi confirmed.
![]() 03/24/2016 at 20:41 |
|
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
OMG! Is the rest of the streetlight okay?
Seriously though, that’s an odd detail to point out, especially to head the article. Everything else about this story is much more interesting than that.
I’m impressed that the driver had only minor injuries.
![]() 03/24/2016 at 20:50 |
|
Wow! She’s lucky the back hit that wall and absorbed a lot of the force. If that wasn’t there and she came down completely flat....well she’d be flat.
![]() 03/24/2016 at 20:51 |
|
Spooky!
![]() 03/24/2016 at 20:52 |
|
Four stories is a long way to drop. I’m very surprised she wasn’t seriously injured.
![]() 03/24/2016 at 20:54 |
|
It’s really bizarre.
![]() 03/24/2016 at 21:11 |
|
It’s Huffington Post...
![]() 03/24/2016 at 21:12 |
|
She probably had it in “D”, and the car reversed anyway due to a software error. 60 Minutes should check that out.
![]() 03/24/2016 at 21:13 |
|
Damn software errors.
![]() 03/24/2016 at 21:14 |
|
“That’s it. I’ve had enough of this garage. I’m Audi here.”
![]() 03/24/2016 at 21:28 |
|
Makes sense, within 4 floors a vehicle would not reach highway speeds on impact, better than hitting a wall while driving at speed.
![]() 03/24/2016 at 21:33 |
|
Love it!
![]() 03/24/2016 at 21:33 |
|
That makes sense.
![]() 03/24/2016 at 21:53 |
|
On the other hand, it didn’t land on the nose or rear bumper first. Cars aren’t normally going roof first into things at high speed. Roofs are required to be pretty strong these days (one reason why we are stuck with fat pillars), but that’s for rollovers, not flying off buildings.